I enjoy the freeware recommendations and find them very valuable as well. The fact is that we have full functionality of a commercial product at no cost.
The publishers of the Software offers on GOATD provide us with software (sometimes for life, other times for a period only). I would like to raise something that has been a concern for a while. It might also be that my understanding for the whole GAOTD concept is flawed. It is just something I felt that should be mentioned. Please note: this is not written because of any specific review or comment that has been made, nor is it directed at anyone in particular. I write this piece because I also dabble in programming from time to time and appreciate criticism that would enable me to improve and maybe even distinct my software. Please let us keep in mind the offer as well as the value proposal to the publishers to use a site like GAOTD. Something like: simplify the registration process, change the color scheme, add the ability to export to., etc. Many times I see software thumbed down because the reviewer does require the software or it see it as necessary. Additionally, improvements should be recommended that would provide the software with a better bang-for-buck ratio. My understanding is that the publishers require the software to be assessed and evaluated.
0 kommentar(er)
